Continuing with the evaluation of the top platforms in the free website maker comparison chart, this blog compares Brinkster and Yola. Both the platforms have good consumer ratings for easy website development and publishing process. Before choosing one of the two platforms, it is essential to compare them in detail.
How Brinkster Scores Over Yola
Comparing Brinkster and Yola is a daunting task as both the platforms have all the features essential for a high quality website development and management. To create a website through either Brinkster or Yola, you need to register as a user. After successful registration, you can select a website template, number of webpages, arrange content fields and add text, images and videos. Both the platforms have drag-and-drop web editor which makes the web publishing process very simple.
Yola scores low as compared to Brinkster due to the lack of product upgrades. Yola website maker has not upgraded easy web editor since 2009. Thus, it does not support new website features, such as Facebook or Twitter integration. On the contrary, Brinkster continuously evolves their platform to provide rich user experience.
In a nutshell, Yola is a prudent choice for users who want a very simple website making platform. For everyone else, Brinkster is a better option.
With online branding gaining high importance in the global and local markets, a number of amateur internet users feel the need to set up a website. While the evolution of free website makers has made website development simpler, the process may seem complex to a new internet user. Thus, it is important to register with a website maker that offers extensive support to consumers.
Webstarts: Top Quality Customer Support
Having held the top position on the free website maker comparison chart since more than 12 months, Webstarts boasts of high quality customer support. The platform allows you to register for a free website and post content regularly through easy web editor. The content management and web publishing process is very simple. To make it simpler, Webstarts offers an extensive video tutorial on every aspect of the web publishing process.
Brinkster: Different Packages for Different Needs
As a free website maker, Brinkster is known for a range of free packages for different web publishing needs. There are varied packages for personal users, individual users and developers. These packages are good for regular internet users; however, they are not suitable for new internet users. Also, the platform lacks video tutorial support for new consumers.
Brinkster and Vistaprint are among the top free website makers available online. Both the platforms allow free accounts which facilitate users to create a website and upload content. While, both the website makers provide basic web publishing features, certain factors make Brinkster rank higher than Vistaprint on the free website maker comparison chart.
Brinkster vs. Vistaprint: How to Make a Choice?
Comparing Brinkster and Vistaprint head-on will give an idea that both the platforms are equally good for creating a free website. Brinkster allows you to create a free website containing 3 web pages, drag-and-drop editor and 15MB web space. Additional features include guestbook, photo album, flash intro, traffic counter, feedback form and multimedia archive. You can also use Meta tags to optimize your website for search engines.
Vistaprint has an advantage over Brinkster in terms of numbers. It offers a 3-page website, 25MB disk space and simplified text editor. Email integration is another unique feature that Vistaprint users can enjoy. However, the free account from Vistaprint does not provide search engine optimization and photo and video integration. Also, the free account facility is limited for a trial period of one month. After the trail period ends, you have to pay $2.99 per month to avail services.
The choice is simpler; Brinkster is the preferred option for creating a free website. However, if you want opt for a paid service, consider paid website packages for both Vistaprint and Brinkster.